United States of Survivor

get hereOn May 31, 2000 something remarkable happened on television, all due to a replacement series that debuted that night. This television program turned the tide of “reality television” and has had a profound influence upon this country. In fact, perhaps more profound than we realize! The show is “Survivor on CBS.

Before I get too far allow me to say that I have never watched an entire episode this program. It never ever appealed to me, and when I learned more about it from obsessed friends, I felt nothing but revulsion. The idea that people would go against one another and vote people “off” the island, “outwitting” others so that one person wins a million dollars is – sorry people – abhorrent to me. Rome before the fall is what I thought then, Rome before the fall is what I feel now. Yeah, yeah, yeah – I sound like a snob, an elitist, a snowflake, go ahead. That’s fine by me. You may say that “It’s just a show, just a game” Watch the promo materials – it is called the “greatest social experiment” for a reason.
“Outwit, outplay, outlast” is the motto. Have fun all alone with your cool million you outwitter, outplayer, you outlaster you!

survivor-300x184Tonight I did begin to watch an episode of the show because I have been wanting to write about it. I’m not going to lie, I’m about 5 minutes into season 30, episode 1 and I can barely stomach it. Sorry Survivor fans. This has been my impression all along, now that I am seeing it – I hate that it is proving me right. I’ll try to keep going, but the motif is clear enough, and I can work with that. Let me share this example, a description of this season that I found here:

The cast is composed of 18 new players, initially split into three tribes containing six members each: Escameca (“Blue Collar”), Masaya (“White Collar”), and Nagarote (“No Collar”).

Perhaps you can begin to see what is so timely about all of this.

So what led me to all of this? Well – two things got the ball rolling. One was this podcast from Fresh Air, in which host Terry Gross interviews Maggie Haberman of the New York Times. Haberman has covered Donald Trump for the NYT for some time, and previously for multiple publications. The second thing that caught my attention was the printed text of this AP interview with the President that was recently published.

The final element was something that happened as I sat in a doctor’s waiting room. A man was talking to his wife about his pain, but then he began to speak of gratitude for how things could be so much worse. He was loud and it was a small waiting room, so I could not help but hear him over the din of CNN on the TV. His passion about gratitude had me near tears, I would not have expected that kind of talk from a man like this – older, larger, roughhewn. Then it happened, he glanced up at the TV, where Sean Spicer was going on about something, and the man went on a major rant about the liars, liberals, and losers that make up the media, and how they were hellbent on destroying President Trump.

Humans are complex, I thought, no – maybe complicated. Maybe both. Anyway, I could not muster anger for him. Yet I knew that he and I saw the world through a shared lens of gratitude, but a cracked lens of politics. As I sat in the exam room moments later, waiting for the doctor, somehow Survivor – for reasons I cannot explain – popped into my head.

Anyway, this is not a takedown of the president, I promise you it is not. It is an analysis of the current situation in the context of faith, culture, and politics. Who are we as a people? How did we get here?

This is too much information to go into very deeply so I will say this, and then urge you to find what it takes to watch at least one episode of Survivor if you have never seen it before. I picked the one that I did because it pitted white collar people versus blue collar people versus “no collar” people. (More free spirited.) SPOILER: A blue collar wins. NOT SPOILER: ust know that you will learn a lot about our country and our culture, just by watching the people introduce themselves.

Briefly, the Maggie Haberman interview on Fresh Air struck me because of the haunted description of Donald Trump.  A man who prefers to sleep in his own bed. Nothing wrong with that, but an oddity if you are the leader of the free world. And his isolation, gathering a cadre of people around him who are… well, they are who they are. Haberman’s take on Bannon staying or going was fascinating. You’ll need to listen to find out. It is just so much intrigue.

Make no mistake, all power centers are rife with intrigue! However, a leader of Trump’s personality and style bring us to levels of intrigue not seen before. Somehow that ol’ Bush White House with Cheney and Rove seems fairly benign to me. Anyway, it is a fascinating podcast full of things I knew, and many that I had not thought of.

hubrisThe AP interview struck me as primarily sad. Then it terrified me. I’m sad because our president simply cannot get through too many sentences without reminding everyone how great and successful he is. So much hubris, but what also appears to be so much insecurity. Whether President Trump is successful or not… I mean, if he is, then we do not need to be reminded on a constant basis. It is unseemly at best.  In the interview, of course he had to emphasize, even if it were true, that Obama got “zippo, zero” and yet Trump got the worker released from Egypt posthaste. I am glad that she is released, but gosh – does it all have to be about Trump? And then there is so much that is either awkward or unclear. Like when he is speaking, I find myself saying out loud to no one, “What is he on about now?”

Anyway, read it for yourself.

Finally – at it’s heart, Survivor is a completely set up “reality” program. As I watched the open for the episode, I saw how slick it was. I’m not surprised – after all, they have had 17 years to perfect it. And I am sad to say that our president, who is used to adulation via his businesses and via his own “reality” show is remarkably similar. I will say this, Survivor is better produced, more slick.

But isn’t it a kind of populist Trumpian dream that we “vote” off the losers so that we can end up with our own prosperous million? That we can have what we want, not sharing it at all? Let’s get all those “fill-in-the-blank” others out of here, and THEN we will be great. What if, what if. What about now? What about human dignity? What about life? What about a strong sense of the common good? I for one am sick to death of hearing about trickle down, as I have since the Reagan era… It is a reminder that others outwit, outplay, and outlast, so the fault with those on the bottom rungs must be their own.

As a Catholic I am also considering the theological implications of living the Eucharist and the kind of mindset that brings us Survivor and the current political situation. Sadly, many of us were catechized to believe that we somehow “earned” the right to the banquet of the Eucharistic table, and that we must “work” for it, and that we “take” communion, or “receive” communion. None of which is true. You cannot outwit, outlast, or outplay your community. Why would you want to? In its greatest sense, the best Eucharistic theology makes it clear that everyone needs to be at table. The Eucharist heals, binds, and propels – it is not the million dollar reward for driving everyone away.

This piece grows long, and I grow tired. At this point, I have merely skittered across the surface of some ideas. I will close this way – remember that a country hooked on “outplay, outwit, and outlast” gets the leadership it deserves. THAT is not a Trump problem, that is our problem and it seems the current president might fit nicely into the model.

What have we done to create this? What can we do to move forward? Me, I’m still wishing I could have had a conversation with the man in the waiting room who was one part graciously and humbly grateful and one part ranting and raving. Mostly I would have asked him questions starting with why. It could have been interesting, what I learned from him, and what he learned from me. If anything. We will never know.

At this point, I am not happy about life in the United States of Survivor, but it seems that is exactly where we are.

What do you think?


11 thoughts on “United States of Survivor

  1. We have a similar TV show in this country, equally unpleasant ; not quite sure why anyone watches it! I am afraid a discussion with the chap in the waiting room would have been fruitless – ” I have made up my mind, now don’t confuse me with facts!” – would have been his answer. The rhetoric of your current president gives cause for concern throughout the world, by the way.


  2. This was wonderful, Fran.

    Wonderfully sad…and I hope people read it and think really hard about the implications of our “Survivor ‘ mentality.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. Wonderfully said! I, too, decided, a long time ago, NOT to watch “Survivor” for the same reasons as you wrote. I find it to be a repulsive program, and refuse to waste my time on it.
    I never watched “The Apprentice” either. I prefer to watch “Madam Secretary” or reruns of “The West Wing” where people work together to achieve a goal that is for “the greater good.”

    Liked by 1 person

  4. I would recommend watching from the first season to get a feel for it. While the premise was the same, there is an unknown quantity to the players as never having seen it before and the first few seasons had a slightly different feeling. We used to watch it a lot but our oldest child became more aware and it was quickly inappropriate for him.

    Liked by 1 person

    • K, I hated the concept then. I have no time to watch it and less desire. I’m sure it had a different feeling. I’m sorry if I sound high-handed but the idea of a sole survivor who competed to win 1 million dollars makes me sick to my stomach.


  5. I saw years ago the original British version on BBC America.. It was a group of people isolated on a Scottish island . The purpose was to see how people could work together and form a living community, not destroy one another. What a sad commentary on our American society. I have never been able to watch any “reality” show, since their purpose seem to be to either divide people from one another or to humiliate people.
    I am basically a very shy person, but I participate in several groups, from book club to gardening to neighborhood bluegrass and beer to faith groups (both service and contemplative).. As a Catholic (and as all Christians) I am called to join together with others in worship and in society. There is a time and place for TV and being online, but there is so much more to life than that.
    Peace, Meriel

    Liked by 1 person

  6. Well, Fran, if anything brightens your world it should be the rejection of MLP and xenophobia in France. Please God let this be a turning point away from populism and the start of more enlightened politics.

    The BBC (bizarrely) continues to give air time to a political party, UKIP, that does not have a single MP and was decimated in local elections. Bile may make good television but it pollutes political debate and should not be over represented by a public service broadcaster.

    What you say about getting the President (PM, Chancellor) we deserve I agree with up to a point. Democracy is what it is. However, when so much of the debate is so facile and most news media fail to hold politicians’ feet to the fire, the choice that the electorate are faced with is quite often not much of a choice.

    Everyone needs to demand more from politicians but, as you say, perhaps politicians are just a reflection of the way that everything (especially TV) has been dumbed down. If we want more rigour then we all need to “vote” with our channel hopping fingers and simply not watch the rubbish. Advertisers will soon pull the plug.


  7. Related to this, you may enjoy reading Simon Wren-Lewis’s latest blog. “Why are the UK and US more vulnerable to right wing populism?” He is talking about it in political-economic terms but it is very interesting nonetheless.


Comments are closed.